Gujarat High Court

The Supreme Court bench directed that NALSA should issue directions to all the State Legal Service Authorities to ensure that all panel advocates should visit the jail and advise the convicts about their legal rights and assist them in drafting the application to pursue their remedy of premature release.

A Single Gujarat High Court bench has heard an appeal where the challenge is made to the judgment and passed by the Special Judge (POCSO) and 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Junagadh dated 15.07.2021.

The petitioner, Yogendra Kumar, has approached the Gujarat High Court for quashing the show cause notice dated 10.05.21 issued by Indian Air Force seeking explanation as to why the Petitioner service should not be terminated for his refusal to take the Covid-19 vaccine.

A petition was filed in the Gujarat High Court, challenging the order passed by the District Magistrate, Gir-Somnath on May 12, 2021, whereby the petitioner was treated as ‘a cruel person’ and detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985

The Gujarat High Court has granted bail to Pathalgadi Movement leader Babita Sukar Kashyap, who was arrested by the Gujarat Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) for anti-national activities.

The petition contended that Section 12 and 13 of the Disaster Management Act have laid down the guidelines for granting minimum standard of relief to the persons affected by disasters like Covid-19, which has been denied to them by Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation

The Apex Court in 2:1 majority verdict in which Justices Nariman and Gavai struck down only Part IX B introduced by the 97th constitutional amendment to deal with cooperative societies, while Justice KM Joseph struck down the entire amendment.

One way to further the right to information is to allow the people access to watch the functioning of the institutions that serve them, as only on the backs of an informed citizenry, a representative democracy survives and evolves.

Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana said that a Judge should never get swayed by popular opinion and must stand up against the popular perception for the call of justice

The Gujarat High Court division bench directed an 18-year-old girl's parents to not harass her for wanting to marry a boy after him attaining the age of marriage.