Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj

While considering the PIL, Calcutta High Court held that the same issue was in previous academic year 2021-22, wherein, WPA (P) 240 of 2021 was filed questioning the notification issued by the respondent University to grant admission on the basis of marks in qualifying examination instead of entrance.

The Calcutta High Court ...

The Calcutta High Court ...

Calcutta High Court division bench disposed of the PIL permitting the petitioners to file an appropriate representation raising the grievance before respondent No.8.

Having regard to the fact that it is a petition filed in the public interest and also considering the nature of controversy involved in the matter, the Calcutta High Court declined the prayer for withdrawal.

Calcutta High Court while disposing of a PIL filed by one Sandip Modak directed the Additional District Magistrate, Hooghly and District Land & Land Reforms Officer (DL&LRO), Hooghly to decide the representation of the petitioner on the issue of grant of patta in favour of the private respondent.

The Calcutta High Court ...

The Calcutta High Court ...

Calcutta High Court disposed of a PIL filed by Niranjan Sen and directed the District Magistrate, Cooch Behar (Panchayat & RD Section) to decide the representation of the Petitioner raising the grievance that under various schemes of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005

Calcutta High Court division bench noted that the petitioner has already filed a detailed representation to the District Magistrate, North 24 Parganas raising the aforesaid grievance.