Wednesday, September 22, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Delhi HC dismisses petition on empanelment

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Delhi High Court on Monday said it cannot entertain the petition filed by a Civil Services qualifier who was assigned Haryana Cadre in India Police Services (IPS) and the remedy of the petition lies only with the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding his consideration for the vacancy of Director General Police (DGP).

The single-judge bench of Justice Jyoti Singh while pronouncing the judgment today stated that “…jurisdiction conferred on High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is an inviolable basic framework of our Constitution, however, with respect to service matters of the employees covered under the Act, High Courts cannot exercise jurisdiction in the first instance. As enunciated by the Supreme Court, all decisions of the Tribunal are subject to scrutiny by a Division Bench of the concerned High Court and it is at this stage that High Court exercises its power of Judicial Review.”

The petition has been filed by a Civil Service Qualifier who applied for the vacancy in the post of DGP, Haryana, the state sent a list of 11 eligible officers who had completed 30 years of service, to UPSC for consideration and empanelment. However, UPSC impaneled three IPS officers, but the Petitioner was not amongst the three. Whereas, the petitioner assails the empanelment made by UPSC and the subsequent appointment of another person as DGP in the state of Haryana.

The Court, however, dismissed the petition stating that the present petition is not maintainable. However, the Court further added that, be open to the Petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for determination of his grievances on merits. The court further made it clear that the Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The arguments were heard and judgment was reserved limited only to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the petition.

Read the Judgment here;

JIS13072020CW33342019-143906

-India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Why aren’t international institutions so easily accessible to Indian lawyers, professors: Justice P.S. Narasimha

The Indian Society of International Law (ISIL) on Wednesday inaugurated its Post Graduation Diploma Courses for 2021-22 and also, the Convocation ceremony for its 2019-20 and 2020-21 batches.

Delhi High Court directs Delhi govt, IHBAS to explain why they didn’t constitute state mental health authority

A single-judge Delhi High Court bench was hearing a plea to set up the State Mental Health Authority (‘SMHA’) and the Mental Health Review Board (‘MHRB’) for Delhi in compliance with the obligations under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Rs 50,000 per Covid death: NDMA recommends ex-gratia payment in affidavit to Supreme Court

Center said in an affidavit in the Supreme Court that the NDMA has recommended an amount of Rs 50,000 each as ex-gratia payment to covid-19 deceased families. The Affidavit, was filed by Govind Mohan, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, was in response to Supreme Court directions.

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking free education to every child with special needs, disabled children

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on a petition seeking directions to ensure free and compulsory education to each and every Child With Special Need (CWSN)/Disabled Children by initiating the process of appointment of Special Teachers as per the Teacher Pupil ratio, which is 1:5.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.