Sunday, September 19, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Delhi High Court puts off plea challenging SOP regarding traffic challans to September

A Single-Judge Bench of Justice Rekha Palli gave stern warning to the petitioner and said, “This is luxury litigation, I don’t have the time for dismissing it with cost today, I will dismiss this on a later date. No urgency.”

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to pass any order in a plea filed by a man challenging the SOP issued by the Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways under the Government of India, requiring clearance of pending challans as a condition precedent to the ‘transfer of ownership’ of motor vehicle.

A Single-Judge Bench of Justice Rekha Palli gave stern warning to the petitioner and said, “This is luxury litigation, I don’t have the time for dismissing it with cost today, I will dismiss this on a later date. No urgency.”

The Court listed the matter for further hearing in September.

The petitioner submitted that Challans should be payable online, even if the SOP is not implemented. “I am not the violator and they never contacted me for violation. When I was transferring the vehicle, they called me to pay the challans,” he said. 

Justice Palli replied, “I don’t think you are correct. You must have seen it online, everything is online, you can check with your vehicle number, if there’s pending fine or not. 

The petitioner had sought directions against the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Govt of India, Government of NCT of Delhi, Ministry of Electronics and IT Government, Chandigarh Administration and Deputy Inspector General of Police UT Chandigarh. 

The petitioner had challenged Clause 4.3 (vi) of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated December 17, 18 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, which read as follows:

“If a challan is pending or has not been disposed, then all transactions involving the vehicle, including the NOC, Fitness, Tax etc and for the Driving Licence – the renewal and address change are not permitted and are reflected to the traffic enforcement agencies across India.

Against the petitioner, there was a challan of Rs 1000 issued by the Chandigarh police in 2019, and the petitioner was unable to pay that at the moment and sold his vehicle in between. But the Vasant Vihar Zonal Office of Transport Department (R-2) refused to process the application for transfer of ownership of the subject vehicle on the pretext that there is/are pending challan(s) under the Motor Vehicles Act of 2019 that must be cleared for the car ownership to be successfully transferred.

On enquiry, it was stated by the Road Transport Office (R2) that the procedure for transfer of ownership was fully computerised and conducted using VAHAN software/website provided by the Ministry of Road Transport Highways (R1) and developed by NIC (R-3) and this software was designed to prevent ownership transfer, if there was any traffic challan pending payment issued anywhere in India.

The petitioner had earlier also filed the petition before the Delhi High Court, seeking directions to either allow transfer of the ownership without insistence on clearance of the challan, or facilitate the payment of the challan online, especially in light of the circumstances created by the Novel Coronavirus pandemic.

The Court had passed the speaking order and asked the authorities to consider the plea as a representation. After that, the petitioner approached the Registering Authority, South West Zone – II, Vasant Vihar, Delhi, which had issued order on December 5, 2020, stating that it cannot permit transfer of ownership since transactions pertaining to the subject vehicle have been ‘blocked’ in VAHAN software.

The concerned officer enclosed a copy of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated December 17, 2018, containing the provision in support of his decision.

Following which, the petitioner moved once again to the High Court and challenged the said SOP. He said, “That by way of this SOP, which has been issued without sanction of law, imposes an arbitrary requirement on registered vehicle owners to clear pending challans issued on the driver of the particular vehicle as a pre-condition of transfer of ownership of a private vehicle, which is not contemplated in the Act.

Also read: Vinod Dua sedition case: Supreme Court to pronounce verdict today

“Traffic offences relating to the driver’s fault are logically to be attached to the driver’s licence and not to the registration plate of the vehicle since the traffic challans are issued to the violator driver and the fine collected is a form of punishment. Forcing the payment from an owner of the vehicle by putting restrictions on the transfer of ownership is akin to punishing the owner of the vehicle and transferring liability of violations on the owner without sanction of law,” it added.

Source: ILNS

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court refuses relief to NLSIU student who wasn’t promoted due to uncleared exams

A two-judge bench of Supreme Court said “How long you want that courts should run the institutions/universities and why should we interfere?” While relying to the contentions of the petitioners counsel to promote her to final year by way of an opportunity.

NGT directs stoppage of Baitarani river project work of sand filling, embankment, retention wall

According to the order 8 applicants are seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the sand filling work of the river basin of Baitarani on the South Bank at the place where river Baitarani bifurcates as Old Baitarani and New Baitarani in the Bhadrak District of Odisha.

Allahabad High Court recalls order listing case of errant advocate before another bench

The Allahabad High Court has recently recalled its order in which it had directed the listing of a matter before another bench citing the "mischievous behaviour of the advocate".

CBI seeks dismissal of petition for separating Director of Prosecution from agency, says post enjoys full autonomy in affidavit

The Central Bureau of Investigation has informed the Delhi High Court that the Directorate of Prosecution has got full autonomy and there is no interference in the functioning of a law officer and it has no decision-making power in the appointment of the Director of Prosecution.

Supreme Court allows appeal against summons issued to invoke power under Section 319 CrPC

The Supreme Court has set aside the summons passed by the Sessions Judge, Khiri saying the Sessions Judge will apply his mind in the light of principles laid down by the Constitution Bench.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.