Wednesday, February 1, 2023
Home Constitutional News Supreme Court Justice Arun Mishra Says Social Media Campaign For His Recusal Is Attempt To Tarnish Judiciary

Justice Arun Mishra Says Social Media Campaign For His Recusal Is Attempt To Tarnish Judiciary

Justice Arun Mishra Says Social Media Campaign For His Recusal Is Attempt To Tarnish Judiciary
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Above: Image by Photo Mix from Pixabay

Supreme Court Justice Arun Mishra on Tuesday said that posts on social media and reports in the mainstream media that sought his recusal from a from a Constitution bench which is hearing the interpretation of provisions of the Land Acquisition Act were not merely an attempt to malign him alone but to show the judiciary itself in a bad light.

“I will be the first person to sacrifice if the integrity of the institution is at stake. I am not biased and don’t get influenced by anything on earth. If I am satisfied that I am biased then only I will recuse myself from hearing this case,” Justice Mishra averred.

Some of the parties including farmers association sought his recusal on the ground of judicial propriety saying that the bench is examining the correctness of the verdict which was also authored by him, agencies reported.


On March 6 last year, the apex court had said a larger bench would test the correctness of two separate verdicts related to land acquisition, delivered by two of its benches of similar strength, which had snowballed into a major controversy.

He asked the parties to satisfy him as to why he should recuse himself from hearing the case.

“I may be criticised for my view, I may not be a hero and I may be a blemished person but if I am satisfied that my conscience is clear, my integrity is clear before God, I will not budge. If I think I will be influenced by any extraneous factor, I will be the first to recuse here,” he said.

Justice Mishra added that the “question is can we not sit in the Constitution bench though it is us who referred the matter to a larger bench. It is not the appeal against the verdict in which I was the party. I may change or correct my view if persuaded”.


At the outset, senior advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for some of the parties, said that since the presiding judge of the five-judge Constitution bench is a signatory of the verdict whose correctness is being examined by the bench there could be an element of impartiality.

The other members of the bench include Justices Indira Banerjee, Vineet Sharan, M R Shah and
S Ravindra Bhat.

Justice Mishra was part of the verdict in which it was held that land acquisition by a government agency could not be quashed on account of delay on the part of owners in accepting compensation within five years due to reasons such as lingering court cases.

—India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.