Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

What is the Supreme Court’s take on West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008?

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Madrasah Service Commission Act, 2008 which came into force for the purpose of recruitment of teachers including Headmasters/Headmistresses of recognised non-Government aided Madrasahs in West Bengal.

The recruitment of non-teaching staff including librarians has been entrusted with the Commission by amendment of the Act. The Commission selects candidates for the appointment as teachers and will soon select non-teaching staff in madrasahs in West Bengal.

A ‘teacher’ under the Act means either an Assistant Teacher or anyone holding a teaching post in a madrasah recognised by the Board of the Council.
It also includes the Headmaster /Headmistress /Superintendent, but does not include the Assistant Headmaster or Assistant Headmistress or the teacher who is holding a post against short term vacancy.

The Supreme Court verdict dated January 6, 2020 said that this law did not affect the right of minority institutions as it upheld national interests, ensuring quality education for the welfare of the students.

It was held that if any regulations seek to ensure the standard of excellence of the institutions while preserving the right of the minorities to establish and administer their educational institutions, such regulations would not violate minority rights under Article 30(1).

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Why aren’t international institutions so easily accessible to Indian lawyers, professors: Justice P.S. Narasimha

The Indian Society of International Law (ISIL) on Wednesday inaugurated its Post Graduation Diploma Courses for 2021-22 and also, the Convocation ceremony for its 2019-20 and 2020-21 batches.

Delhi High Court directs Delhi govt, IHBAS to explain why they didn’t constitute state mental health authority

A single-judge Delhi High Court bench was hearing a plea to set up the State Mental Health Authority (‘SMHA’) and the Mental Health Review Board (‘MHRB’) for Delhi in compliance with the obligations under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Rs 50,000 per Covid death: NDMA recommends ex-gratia payment in affidavit to Supreme Court

Center said in an affidavit in the Supreme Court that the NDMA has recommended an amount of Rs 50,000 each as ex-gratia payment to covid-19 deceased families. The Affidavit, was filed by Govind Mohan, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, was in response to Supreme Court directions.

Supreme Court reserves verdict on plea seeking free education to every child with special needs, disabled children

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its judgment on a petition seeking directions to ensure free and compulsory education to each and every Child With Special Need (CWSN)/Disabled Children by initiating the process of appointment of Special Teachers as per the Teacher Pupil ratio, which is 1:5.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.