Wednesday, June 23, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Disha Ravi moves Delhi HC seeking directions to restrain Delhi Police from leaking any investigation material

In her plea she has sought directions not to disclose the contents of her private chats/communication to any third party including the media.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Climate Activist Disha Ravi arrested in Toolkit Case moved Delhi High Court seeking directions to restrain Delhi Police from leaking any investigation material relating to the case filed against her by the Special Cell. 

In her plea she has sought directions not to disclose the contents of her private chats/communication to any third party including the media. 

“…to pass directions to the Ministry of I&B seeking to take appropriate action against Respondent Nos. 4-6 and all other satellite TV channels including under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, and restrain them from publishing the contents and/or extracts of any alleged private chats (including WhatsApp chats) between her and third  parties,” 

-said the plea. 

“The Petitioner has preferred this Petition as she is severely aggrieved and prejudiced by the media trial surrounding her arrest and the ongoing investigation, where she is being viscerally attacked by the Delhi Police and several media houses, on the basis of leaked investigative matter and prejudicial press briefings, which is grossly violative of her right to a fair trial and presumption of innocence,” the plea said. 

Ravi has said in her petition that the illegal actions and omissions on part of the Respondents has irrevocably violated her fundamental right to privacy, her right to reputation, her dignity, and the consequent effect of the administration of justice and right to fair trial – all guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

“…there is no clarification in any of the tweets or the news reporting to the effect that disclosure statements or ‘admissions’ made whilst in police custody are wholly inadmissible in evidence and have no basis in law. As such, in view of the facts described herein, it is highly likely that the general public will perceive these news items as being conclusive as to the guilt of the Petitioner,”

-the plea said.

On Tuesday, a District court in Delhi had allowed her applications to speak to her mother, access to books, for providing her warm clothes, home cooked food and to have access to lawyer. The Court had also allowed her access to the copy of Charge sheet, arrest memo, grounds of arrest and remand application. 

She was arrested from Bangalore on February 13, 2021, by Delhi police and charged with sedition for ‘formulation and dissemination’ of a toolkit to aid protesting farmers which was shared by Greta Thunberg.

On February 14, 2021, she was produced before the Court of CMM, in the FIR No 49/2021. The Court had sent her to five-days police custody remand which is going to be end on 19th February, 2021. 

In its PC remand application the Delhi Police had submitted, “for proper investigation her detailed interrogation is required to get information by the Pro Khalistani Group Poetic Justice Foubdation and their active members are to be identified.” 

The Delhi Commission for Women had also taken Suo-Motu cognizance on media reports of arrest of Disha Ravi by Delhi Police. The Commission had sent a notice to Delhi Police. 

In its notice DCW said, according to media reports Disha Ravi was arrested from Bengaluru allegedly for supporting farmer’s protests. It has been alleged in the media by some activists that she was taken to Delhi from Bengaluru with no disclosure of her whereabouts, not even to her parents. She was brought to Delhi without presenting her before a local court for transit remand. It has been further alleged in media reports that she was produced before the Court in Delhi without lawyer of her choice being present in the Court. 

The DCW had said, this is a very serious matter, citing Delhi High Court order wherein Court had stated, “Every endeavour should be made to obtain transit remand after producing the arrestee before the nearest magistrate…unless exigencies of the situation warrants otherwise.” 

It further stated, that as per Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India says that every person arrested has the right to be defended by a “legal practitioner of his choice”. 

Also Read: Priya Ramani-MJ Akbar case: Key points from order

The DCW had requested Delhi Police to provide; 

1- Copy of the FIR

2- Reasons for allegedly not producing the arrested girl before the local court for transit remand. 

3- Reasons for allegedly not providing the lawyer of her choice to the girl when she was produced before the court in Delhi. 

4- Detailed action taken report in the matter.

The Commission had directed to submit the relevant information to it latest by 19th February, 2021. 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Narada case: Supreme Court to hear Mamata Banerjee’s plea on June 25 after another judge recuses himself

On the earlier hearing in the matter, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted the grievance that the affidavit is of utmost importance, because whatever the CBI has alleged, has to be rebutted by the accused persons.

Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari named Acting Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court

President Ram Nath Kovind today appointed Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari as the Acting Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.