Tuesday, August 3, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Rahul’s written question on PM-CARES in LS gets a cryptic ‘No’ as answer from govt

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

New Delhi: The Central government has replied a categorical “No”, to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi’s written question in Parliament today on the status of PM CARES vis-à-vis the RTI Act.

The MP had placed a question, saying:

“Whether it is a fact that according to the Ministry #PMCARES was set up on March 27, 2020 by the Central Government thus making it a public authority under the ambit of Section 2 (h) of the RTI Act, 2005 and if so, the details thereof.”

The answer that came from the government was “No”.

pm care

While the opposition has cried for accounts of PM CARES to be made public, and an open audit be allowed, and has also cried about the apparent opacity of the fund, the government has never been in a mood to reveal the inner workings of the fund.

There was a petition in the Supreme Court asking for money from the fund to be transferred to the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF), for use during this pandemic. On August 18, the top court rejected the appeal and ruled that funds from PM CARES need not be transferred. The court said that monies collected by the PM CARES fund are “entirely different” and are of charitable trusts. They need not be transferred to the NDRF.

Read Also: Ladakh Face-off: Pluses & Minuses

The court ruled that the government is free to transfer money to the disaster response fund if it feels it is appropriate to so do.

The issue had been swept under the carpet after this ruling, but Rahul brought it up again today and received this cryptic reply. The issue remains as opaque as ever.

– India Legal Bureau

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Supreme Court dismisses Additional Session Judge’s challenge to compulsory retirement

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition challenging the Full Court order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, recommending a retired Judge's compulsory retirement and order of Governor of Haryana, accepting the recommendation made by the full court of P&H High Court.

Delhi HC dismisses PIL for scrapping use of EVMs for elections, imposes Rs 10,000 cost

A Delhi High Court division bench noted, " it appears that this is not a Public Interest Litigation at all. This is a ‘Publicity Interest Litigation,"

Manipur High Court disposes of PIL on water supply to Covid-19 containment zones in state

The PIL in Manipur High Court was filed by a resident of Chalou Maning Leikai that after the village was declared a Containment Zone, no water is available because water tankers are reluctant to come to the area to supply water.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.