Thursday, May 2, 2024
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Courts
Update

A special court in Uttar Pradesh postponed hearing in a 2018 defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his alleged objectionable remark targeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah to May 14 as no judge was assigned to the MP-MLA court.  Rahul Gandhi's counsel Kashi Prasad Shukla said that the hearing was scheduled for Thursday but could not be held as a judge was yet to be assigned to the court. Subsequently, the MP-MLA court scheduled May 14 as the next date of hearing in t...

Feature

A test case

The Kerala High Court has recently laid down detailed guidelines on the very limited scope of cases where DNA test of children born to rape can be carried out. This is to protect the child in the future, said the Court

At the Crossroads

Vacillation by courts while deciding MTP cases shows the enormity and difficulty of their decisions. The rights of the mother have to be balanced with that of the child and require great sensitivity

Columns

A Jury For The Judge

The Calcutta High Court has cancelled the appoint...

Devotional Duty

Policemen and women inside the Kashi Vishwanath T...

Specials

Job Losses in Silicon Valley

Last year, the tech industry lost 2,60,000 jobs—more than in the dotcom meltdown two decades ago. There is little evidence that this will let up in 2024. The technology field is shifting in a direction that is not a good trend for Indian technology workers in the USA on H-1B visas

Trump on Trial

The former president has been confined to a Manhattan courtroom. He faces 34 felony charges after prosecutors accused him of faking business records to conceal a hush-money payment made to a porn star in 2016. He faces three other prosecutions, but this will most likely be the only trial before the November election

Twitter Feeds

Cause List

FlipHTML5 LightBox Embed Demo

Law Firms

A Jury For The Judge

Devotional Duty

Law Schools

News
Update

The Supreme Court Registrar recently refused to receive the application filed by the Centre seeking clarification of the 2012 judgment in the 2G Spectrum case. The central government sought a clarification that the verdict does not bar the allocation of spectrum through means other than public auction in certain situations. Mentioning that the application was in effect seeking a review of the 2012 verdict in the guise of seeking clarification, the Registrar dismissed it by terming it misconc...