Wednesday, January 19, 2022
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Allahabad HC quashes suspension of employee merely due to FIR

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

The Allahabad High Court has not accepted the suspension of an employee only on the basis of having an FIR lodged against him. The Court said the same basis has been taken in the charge-sheet given to the employee which is in the FIR. This means that the officer issuing the suspension order has not exercised his discretion.

The Court, while quashing the suspension order, directed the petitioner to file his reply on the charge-sheet. A single bench of Justice Neeraj Tiwari heard the petition of Rajkumar Tiwari, a Class III employee in the Food Controller’s Office, Mirzapur.

The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petitioner has been working as a Class III employee in the office of Regional Food Controller, Vindhyachal Region, Mirzapur. State Government on April 28, 2018 issued policy for appointment of Handling and Transport Contractor, which provides three members committee for that purpose. Pursuant to that, order dated February 01,2020, Regional Food Controller, Vindhyachal Region, Mirzapur also appointed committee for the said purpose.

Advertisement was issued, tenders were invited and technical bids were opened. For District Gopiganj, four firms were found eligible and ultimately, contract was given to M/s Laptop Care order dated on June 10, 2020. Against M/s Laptop Care, certain complaints were received due to which notice dated on July 24 , 2020 was issued and ultimately, order dated 14.8.2020, contract of M/s Laptop Care was cancelled.

He further submits that in the technical bid of another firm, namely, M/s Vineet Inter Prizes also found successful, but contract was not awarded to that firm, therefore, that proprietor of firm has lodged FIR against M/s Laptop Care, Petitioner and others at P.S. Gopiganj, which was registered as case crime no. 303 of 2020, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C. and Section 66 of Information of Technology Act, 2008.

In the complete procedure of allotment of contract, the petitioner is having no role, but he has been placed under suspension only on the ground that criminal proceeding has been initiated against him by lodging of FIR. Investigating Officer submitted final report dated on October 29, 2020 and endorsement was also made in GD on October 28, 2020, the Counsel added.

Competitive company Vineet Inter Prizes filed a lawsuit at Gopiganj Police Station against several people including M/s Lap Top and petitioner for not getting the contract. The petition was suspended on the basis of this FIR.

The Senior Advocate said that after the Court sought an answer in the matter, petitioner was caught by the department in a hurry, with the intention of defending himself. There is no fact against the Petitioner in the charge sheet.

Also Read: Arnab Goswami goes all out, submits undeniable evidence of prejudgement, politically-scripted action of Minister Maharashtra Anil Deshmukh in Anvay Naik Case

After looking at the documents, the Court said that the chargesheet has been prepared on the basis of FIR. No separate investigation was conducted. Court has cancelled the suspension order.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Allahabad High Court rejects bail to man held with 1025 kg ganja

A single judge Allahabad High Court bench while hearing a Criminal Misc Bail Application filed by Shankar Varik @ Vikram rejected the application filed in the case of extension of bail of the accused in the case of possessing 1025 kg of ganja.

Supreme Court directs Maharashtra govt to submit data on OBCs to State Backward Class Commission

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reprimanded the Maharashtra government for insisting on holding local body elections on the basis of information and data already available with it concerning the Other Backward Classes, rather than submitting the same with the Maharashtra State Backward Classes Commission.

Marital rape: Delhi HC asks amicus to take decision on postulation

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday asked Senior Advocate and Amicus Curiae Rebecca John to consider whether the postulation that the exception to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, takes away or abridges the right of a woman to prosecute for rape when the perpetrator is the husband is a correct and proper analysis of the exception.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.