Saturday, May 15, 2021
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Delhi HC orders release of man from deportation centre illegally detained by officials

The order was passed by a division bench of the high court presided by Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup J Bhambani while hearing a habeas corpus filed by a woman seeking to release her husband from the deportation centre.

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

ILNS: The Delhi High Court The Delhi High Court has ordered the release of an Indian national, wrongly detained under Sections 419/420/468/471/120B of the IPC and Sections 3/9 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 as well as Sections 14A and 14B of the Foreigners Act 1946.

The man, Asif Hossain, who had been picked up from a railway station, had already served a prescribed ‘sentence’ by a lower court, but was moved to a deportation centre, despite him holding a valid Indian passport.

The High Court bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup J Bhambani maintained that “he (Hossain) is being detained without any legal cause, occasion or justification; and in gross violation of the procedure established by law.” The court observed that the person concerned is actually an Indian citizen, has been proved through his Indian passport.

The issue had come up before the bench in a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman, seeking the release of Hossain from detention centre. The woman said Hossain was her husband.

The judgement noted, “Upon duly serving the entire sentence, in terms of aforesaid judgment dated November 7, 2019, Asif Hossain was released from Central Jail No 14, Mandoli Prison Complex Delhi; but was sent by the State to undergo detention at the ‘Sewa Sadan Deportation Centre’ Narela, Lampur Village in Delhi.”

While the release was official, the court, however, directed the man to participate in any proceedings that may be instituted by the official respondents under the Foreigners Act or otherwise, in accordance with the law, if and when required.

The bench noted, “The official respondents have been unable to establish that man is a foreign national. There is also no quarrel with the factual position that man is not wanted in any other case or that he has other criminal antecedents.”

During the hearing over video-conferencing, Amicus Curiae and Senior Counsel Dayan Krishnan said the detention is without any justification and contrary to the relevant provisions of the Foreigners Act.

The court has now listed the matter for further hearing on May 21, for consideration of the report filed by the Judicial Officer.

Read Also: SEBI imposes Rs 25 crore penalty on Yes Bank for bond misselling to customers

Advocates Ajay Verma, Mehek Nakraand and Aakanksha Bansal appeared for the petitioner while Advocate Dhruv Pande appeared for the respondent authority.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Peace Mediation – Legal Revolution 5.0

The fine distinction between Meditation and Mediation is the presence and absence of the letter 'T'. In meditation, the Self itself acts as the Third Party or the Teacher and guides Self to realise the true nature of Self. 'T' in mediation is the mediator.

Calcutta High Court directs authorities to inspect health, condition of mobile tower on senior citizen’s roof

The Calcutta High Court on May 12 , while disposing a Petition of a Senior Citizen , directed the Concerned Authorities to inspect the health and condition of the mobile tower installed on the roof of the building of the petitioner.

Allahabad High Court stays judicial officer’s FIR against Chief Medical Officer

The bench requested the Registrar General of the Court to remind the concerned judicial officer to abide by the guidelines of the High Court on Covid-19 pandemic in passing such orders in future.

Maratha quota: Centre moves Supreme Court for review of stripping states of power to declare SEBC

The Centre on Friday moved the Supreme Court seeking a review of the judgment of May 5 by the Constitution Bench which struck down Maratha reservation as envisaged by the Maharashtra Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.