Madras High Court

The Court also said every Advocate needs to maintain the grace and the dignity of the profession. One cannot wear T-shirt and Jeans and come to Court, the Temple of Justice.

The Bench was, however, skeptical of how useful limiting the hours for the broadcast of such content would be, given that the time schedule for children may not be the same in the era of online classes.

An advocate P. Bagyalakshmi mislead the inspector of police via a letter stating that the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court on 3rd December has been revoked by the Court on 4th December and the order can’t be enforced by the Commissioner of Police, Chennai.

The committee has also asked all the Principal District Judges, Principal Judge (City Civil Court, Chennai), Chief Judge (Court of Small Causes, Chennai), Chief Judge (Puducherry) to submit their suggestions in relation to the functioning of the lower courts by December 23.

A single judge bench of Justice V Parthiban while hearing the petition through video conferencing noted that "corrective measures are required to be initiated and completed by an impartial inquiry to allay the residuary apprehensions of some of the unsuccessful and aggrieved candidates.”

The bench on Thursday found that the affidavit filed by the Labour Commissioner contains a cliched, trite and commonplace expression of 'apology' accompanied by usual mundane deferential verbalisms not intended to convey true sense of regret for his crafty transgression.

On Tuesday, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Karti Chidambaram, said the accused was discharged on December 11 and sought an adjournment for two months.

The Madras High Court recalled an order that had already been pronounced after one of the counsels cried injustice in open court, stating it had been passed without hearing her arguments.

The facts of the case is that , in 2012 the CBI had seized gold alleging that Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation of India (MMTC) officials in Chennai had shown an unfairly supportive attitude towards Surana Corporation Limited, which stemmed from gold and silver imports.

The non-disclosure came to light during a joint search conducted by officials from the Income Tax Department and the Enforcement Directorate on December 1, 2015 in connection with the case of Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt Ltd.