Monday, May 10, 2021
Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Supreme Court stays Uttarakhand High Court order directing CBI probe against Trivendra Singh Rawat in alleged bribery case

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

New Delhi (ILNS): The Supreme Court today stayed the Uttarakhand High Court order directing a CBI probe against Uttarakhand Chief Minister Trivendra Singh Rawat.

The bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M. R. Shah, while issuing notice, directed the respondents to file their reply within a period of 4 weeks.

Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing on behalf of Uttarakhand CM Rawat, submitted that the Chief Minister was not a party in the case before the high court, despite that, it ordered a CBI probe. He further submitted:

“This is against Supreme Court verdicts which disallow destabilizing the government as such verdicts demand resignation of the CM, which is happening.”

Pointing out that the high court took up the case without issuing a notice to the Chief Minister, Venugopal submitted that the Shivakumar case states that an investigation cannot be made against a person who is not a party to the case. Moreover, the high court had mixed up all the grounds. The person against whom FIR is registered is bound to be heard, especially in case of a person who holds a public office.

The AG further submitted that the question that arises in the present case is whether the high court could have passed an order directing investigation without providing a reasonable opportunity for being heard. The impugned order directing inquiry and investigation in a case where not even a complaint has been lodged is against the principle of natural justice, added AG Venugopal.

Senior Counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for the original petitioner (Umesh Kumar) in the High Court, submitted that the matter is serious and there are WhatsApp messages from CM and there are bank statements linking to the Uttarakhand CM.

Justice Shah, however, said:

“The High Court took up the issue suo motu and no complaint had been filed by the petitioner. The CM was not made a party to the case and everyone was taken by surprise.”

Sibal said that the matter may be admitted and there was no objection from their part if the court stayed the investigation for the time being.

The Uttarakhand High Court on October 27 directed the CBI to start a probe against Rawat on a bribe allegation made by two journalists. Thereafter the Chief Minister moved the Supreme Court, challenging the high court’s order.

The allegation made by the two journalists — Umesh Kumar Sharma and Shiv Prasad Semwal – was about a bribe that the Chief Minister and his associates had allegedly taken. The allegations were made in a report they had uploaded on a social media platform. The immediate response from the government was an FIR in their names. The journalists then moved the high court for the quashing of the FIR.

Also Read: Supreme Court stays Rajasthan High Court order upholding death sentence of person involved in gruesome murder

At the Uttrakhand High Court, Justice Ravindra Maithani directing the CBI probe said:

“Considering the nature of allegations levelled against Trivendra Singh Rawat, the Chief Minister of the State, it would be appropriate to unfold the truth.”

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

News Update

Health activist moves SC, seeks uniform protocol for Covid treatment, calls for national body of experts

The plea has been filed by health activist and public health expert Amulya Nidhi through AOR Abhimanue Shrestha and settled by Senior Advocate Sanjay Parikh.

Flight crew breath check: Delhi HC asks DGMS to consider if test can be held in open because of Covid aerosol fears

The counsel further submitted that the last order the DGCA, obtained data from various airlines which reveals that most of the airlines are conducting testing using breath analyzers, which is much higher than 10% and in some airlines, even close to 30%.

Kerala High Court directs Kochi civic body to widen drain before monsoon

A Single Bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran observed that it will not be possible for this Court to enter into the questions of encroachments at this time, because of the impending monsoons, which is likely to hit the shores of Kerala by the end of May or the first week of June, 2021.

Declare Covishield essential commodity, cap price at Rs 157 per vial, says plea in Supreme Court

The Petitioner while calling the pricing announced by SII discriminatory i.e. Rs 400 and Rs 700, further prays to impose price ceiling of Rs 157 and make it available to both Government and Private hospitals.

Dhankhar orders CBI investigation, but how?

The Supreme Court or a High Court can allow the CBI to carry out any probe. That has not happened in this case. The CBI did not approach any court of law.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.